The Judicial Branch of Arizona, Maricopa County
Superior Court >Lower Court And Admin Appeals
Rules Civ Proc
| LC2005-000237-001 DT Phoenix Capital Group v. Point to Point Brokerage Rule 55 Default Judgment - sufficiency of service of complaint and notice of default on corporation. |
| LC2004-000220-001 DT Brown and Brown Nissan v. Fioramonti - Rule 56 - no genuine issues of material fact so summary judgment was correct. |
| LC2003-000895-001 DT Lovejoy V. Boyster trial judge erred in denying cross-motions for summary judgment, where no facts at issue; judge also erred by denying counsels' request for oral argument. |
| LC2003-000388-001 DT CMH-Mountain Gate MHP v. Panetta Rule 60(c) Motion denied |
| LC2003-000320-001 DT Cohn V. Wolfe Rule 16(f) sanctions too severe against Apellant for counsel's actions (non-actions). |
| LC2003-000101-001 DT Shamrock Foods Co. v. Billy Bobs Park-N-Pork Affirm order for summary judgment |
| CV2002-004801 Stromfors v. Cunningham R. 55 - Default proper where ? failed to timely appear for trial |
| CV2002-006835 Combs v. Shotey R. 26 Disclosure |
| CV2002-008754 MV Acceptn. v. Arteaga Rule 8(d), aff. defendants |
| CV2002-009304 Miramonte Apts v. Catania Rule 60(c) - J. erred - denial of mot. to set aside jmt. - no evid. of identity |
| CV2002-010686 White v. NW Airlines R. 56 Summary Judgment - error |
| CV2002-012350 King v. Mortgage Power R. 16 Disclosure |
| CV2002-014336 Wells Fargo v. Hamblen Rule 55(a) Entry of Default not required where entry ineffective as matter of law |
| CV2002-015988 Cilke v. Bierman R. 56 Summary Judgment - "Piercing corporate veil" and "Alter Ego" rule |
| CV2002-016933 Gould v. Triton Realty R. 55(a) - Default where no timely answer filed |
| CV2002-090220 Palo Mesa v. Edmund Motion to set aside; missing record presumed supportive of trial ruling |
| CV2002-090639 Sup Spgs HOA v. Boothe Rule 56, summary judgment |
| LC2002-000175 State v. Ajama Rule 58(a) - Default judgment must be signed by judge |
| LC2002-000228 State v. Adamo R. Civ. Proc. 60(c), motion to set aside default |
| LC2002-090031 State v. Kovach R. Civ. Proc. 60(c), motion to set aside default |
| LC2002-000513 State v. King R. 60(c)no abuse of discretion in denying motion to set aside default judgment |
| CV2001-015429 A.V. Auto v. Kuperman Rule 60(c); default judgment |
| CV2001-017015 N. Pt. HOA v. Haggerty Rule 60(c) mot denied - upheld; HOA fines/sanctions |
| CV2001-017252 Unishiprs v. Print Exprns Rule 56, summary judgment; aff'd |
| CV2001-018488 Villas West v. Azizi Record supports denial of Rule 60(c) motion |
| LC2005-000818-001-DT Serrano v. Wein Rule 60(c), motion to set aside default judgment; counsel's failure to request continuance of settlement conference did not constitute excusable neglect. (Judge David R. Cole) |
| Summary Judgment |
|---|
| LC2005-000195-001 DT Viacom Outdoor Inc. V. Chiro Plus Failure to timely respond to motion for summary judgment, sufficiency of motion for relief under Rule 56. |
© 2007
