| a.) 2d Sample |
|---|
| LC2003-000091-001 DT State V. Williams Due Process does not require a 2nd breath sample on an Intoxilyzer machine. |
| LC2001-000342 State v. McRae DUI; second sample |
| LC2001-000424 State v. Russell DUI; second sample |
| LC2001-000790 State v. Martin No separate sample req'd if Intoxilyzer used. |
| b.) Alcohol-Related Offenses, non-DUI |
|---|
| LC2003-000397-001 DT State v. Lemke 4-244.33 (under 21 driving w/ alcohol in body) is not a lesser included offense of DUI. |
| LC2001-000468 State v. Switzenberg Oper. veh. w BAC; underage consumption |
| c.) Blood Draw |
|---|
| LC2005-000285-001 DT State v. Petersen sufficiency of evidence whether blood drawer was qualified person |
| LC2003-000826-001 DT State v. Novalla Blood drawn for med. purposes w/out warrant |
| LC2003-000166-001 DT State v. Ukeneskey police officer trained as phlebotomist was qualified to draw blood. |
| LC2002-000281 State v. Cingel Seizure of blood drawn for medical purposes pursuant to 28-1388(E) |
| LC2002-000368 State v. Combs Phlebotomist was a "qualified person" to perform blood draw. |
| LC2001-000561 State v. Kibarian ARS 28-1388(E) for medical purposes |
| LC2001-000634 State v. Miller Blood draw pursuant to ARS § 28-1321 |
| TEMP0001 State v. ______ DUI Blood Draw - Affirm |
| TEMP0002 State v. ______ DUI Blood Draw - Reverse |
| d.) HGN Test |
|---|
| LC2001-000135 State v. Warren DUI; HGN test |
| LC2001-000136 State v. McLeod DUI; HGN; suff of evid. |
| LC2001-000384 State v. Fujimoto Corpus delicti appeal (denial of); DUI; HGN test |
| LC2001-000391 Dejeet v. State DUI; HGN evid.; mot. in limine |
| return to top |
| e.) Intoxilyzer Data |
|---|
| LC2002-000131 State v. Secondo Right to consult with counsel |
| LC2002-000061 State v. Gill No viol of Rt. to Counsel in DUI case; def called his mother, not an atty. |
| LC2001-000069 State v. Flores DUI; Mot. to suppr; DUI data |
| LC2001-000111 State v. Sullivan DUI; const'ty; mot. to suppress; sufficiency of evidence |
| LC2001-000166 State v. James DUI missing data; suppr. of evid; proper maint of test eqp |
| LC2000-002174 State v. Lopez DUI - adopt rulings, findings, holding of Hentges |
| LC1999-000457 State v. Armstrong DUI; data destroyed; mot. to suppress |
| return to top |
| f.) Intoxilyzer Operating Correctly |
|---|
| LC2003-000340-001 DT State v. Carrillo DUIS - variations of body temp & breathing patterns not relevant w/out factual basis |
| LC2002-000659 State v. Kruidenier reliability of breath test was a question for jury. |
| LC2002-000655 State v. Palomino DUIS - affin denial of suppression mot. re operation of Intoxilyzer. |
| LC2002-000165 State v. Jennings Intoxilyzer operating correctly |
| LC2002-000159 State v. Eversull Intoxilyzer operating correctly; alt. method of admitting breath test results |
| LC2002-000352 State v. Kalos prima facie evid that Intoxilyzer was operating correctly. |
| LC2001-000866 State v. Nantonie DUI; BAC > .10; failure to stop at red light; failure to drive on right side of road |
| return to top |
| g.) Motion for Retrial |
|---|
| LC2001-000042 State v. Icenogle DUI; for mistrial; police officer testimony |
| return to top |
| h.) Motion to Dismiss/Suppress |
|---|
| LC2003-000139-001 DT State v. Haven limited right to counsel during DUI investigation. |
| LC2003-000112-001 DT State v. Rodriguez "std. of review" on a motion to dismiss or suppress |
| LC2003-000111-001 DT State v. Westall std. on Mot. to Suppress - foundation for Intoxilyzer results |
| LC2002-000019 State v. Wise Standard of Review |
| LC2001-000840 State v. Devlin Standard of Review |
| LC2001-000858 State v. Browder DUI - limited right to counsel in DUI investigation |
| return to top |
| i.) Phlebotomist |
|---|
| LC2002-000592 State v. Brown police officers are not disqualified from performing blood draws. |
| LC2003-000313-001 DT State v. Blair "Law of case doctrine" applic appellate decisions; reconsideration by judge appropriate where new case law (ou point) decided. |
| LC2003-000166-001 DT State v. Ukeneskey police officer trained as phlebotomist was qualified to draw blood. |
| LC2002-0000467 State v. Goodman Form does not coerce "no recollection" |
| CV2001-010240 Shafer v. Goodman Blood draw; leg quals of phlebotomist |
| CV2001-011726 Vukovich v. Switzer Blood draw; leg quals of phlebotomist |
| LC2001-000234 State v. Hernandez Blood draw; leg quals of phlebotomist |
| LC2001-000410 State v. Sembach Phlebotomist's qualifications |
| LC2001-000443 State v. Waite Phlebotomist; blood draw |
| LC2001-000448 State v. Williams Rt. to confront; DUI; leg quals of phlebotomist |
| LC2001-000559 State v. Scales Phlebotomist qualifications |
| LC2001-000714 State v. Turner Blood draw; leg quals of phlebotomist. Name spelled "Tyrner." |
| LC2001-000779 State v. Palmer Phlebotomist's qualifications |
| return to top |
| j.) Rebut Testimony |
|---|
| LC2001-000298 State v. Secrest DUI; rebuttal testimony |
| return to top |
| k.) Various |
|---|
| LC2004-000076-001 DT State v. Thompson No error by trial judge in denying def.'s mot. to continue where def.'s expert (Chester Flaxmayer) not avail. for the trial. Def. has resp. to subpoena and schedule his experts - or, to find an alternate expert. Flaxmayers schedule may not dictate the courts schedule. |
| LC2003-000378-001 DT State v. Dykman No viol. of due process (def.'s right to gather exculp. evid.) where def. held by police 6 hours after arrest. |
| LC2003-000824-001 DT State v. Clay State bears burden of justifying decision to end def's phone call to atty during DUI investigation. |
| LC2003-000686-001 DT State v. Filas Def. not elgible for two-for-one time on extreme DUI charge. |
| LC2003-000384-001 DT State v. Moyer Jr. gen. expert testimony about personal ' effect on breath test not admissible unless tied to evid. in the case - Guthrie case. |
| LC2003-000313-001 DT State v. Blair "Law of case doctrine" applic to appellate decisions; reconsideration by judge appropriate where new case law (ou point) decided. |
| LC2003-000304-001 DT State V. Bustamante "corpus delicti" in DUI case req. evid of "reas. inference" that some intox. person was driving at the time of the offense. |
| LC2003-000071-001 DT State v. Culleeny DUI; blood drawn for Med - purposes admissible |
| LC2002-000650 State V. Oconnor "home arrest" is not jail w/in meaning of 28-1382(F) |
| LC2002-000595 State v. Mcdonough DUI; blood drawn for Med - purposes admissible |
| LC2002-000031 Espinoza v. State Independent blood sample - dism. aff'd. |
| LC2002-000089 State v. Harris DUI is not a victimless crime |
| LC2002-000029 State v. Winter Multiplicitous charges; Extreme DUI |
| LC2001-000085 State v. Won DUI; BAC > .10; mot to suppr; lang. problem |
| LC2001-000121 State v. Guthrie DUI; rate of blood alcohol; mot. in limine |
| LC2001-000209 State v. George DUI; no current reg'n; improper jury instr. |
| LC2001-000470 State v. Indicavitch Agg DUI; DUI, minor present; rqmt for speedy restitution |
| LC2001-000522 Huffman v. State Suff. of evid; DUI/var; mot. to suppr. |
| LC2001-000598 State v. Schaeffer 5th A viol of DP, DUI, other traffic viols |
| LC2001-000631 State v. Williams DUI; BAC > .10; speed not reas./prudent; mot to dismiss; denial of access to atty |
| LC2001-000680 State v. Simpson DUI; breath-to-blood ratio evid. |
| LC2001-000760 Mason v. State App by State; mot. to suppr; leg quals of phleb.; rev'd & rem'd to Scottsdale City Ct. |
| LC2001-000840 State v. Devlin Intoxilyzer results may be admitted pursuant to "Deason" | LC2001-000211 State v. Portell DUI; suppr. of evid; maint of test eqp; guilt aff'd. |
| LC2001-000232 State v. Norton DUI; mot. to suppr.; data destroyed |
| LC2001-000247 State v. Depascal DUI; mot. to suppr.; waiver of objn |
| LC2001-000319 State v. Costa DUI; sufficiency of evidence |
| return to top |
| l.) Sentence |
|---|
| LC2003-000705-001 DT State v. Davis def. convicted of Extreme DUI w/ a prior of resisting arrest is not elgible for home detention. |
| return to top |