The Judicial Branch of Arizona, Maricopa County
Superior Court >Lower Court And Admin Appeals
Attorney Fees
| LC2004-000619-001 DT Phoenix Newspapers INC v. City of Tempe Sp. Actions juris. appropriate to order City of Tempe to comply w/ newspapers request for salaries of city employees under Ariz. Public Records Law. All public employees salaries are open to public inspection. Ct. awarded atty. fees against Tempe for its wrongful refusal to comply w/ Public Records Law request. |
| LC2004-000373-001 DT Summerfield v. Rettke Award of fees mandated by contract clause, award of fees pursuant to A.R.S. 33-1256(H). |
| LC2004-000352-001 DT JGH, LLC v. Cassity-Cole A non-profit legal aid organization may request and recover atty fees. |
| LC2003-000901-001 DT TM Developmnet Group LLC v. Peterson Atty fees are discrtionary even under ARS 12-341.01 |
| LC2003-000410-001 DT Saguaro Gold v. Successful Dogs Specific stats apply over gen.- Garnishment atty fees |
| CV2002-091420 J & M Carpet v. Lapsy Reverse atty fees awarded per USCA 1988 |
| CV2002-013288 Malanado v. FIL-AM 12-341.01 limits atty fees award to amount paid, or agreed to be paid. |
| CV2002-003859 AZ Q Air & Elec v. Meza Denial of attys fees; failure to incl rqst in pretrial motion |
| CV2001-090769 TPS v. Seline Atty fees & costs due prevailing party per contractual clause |
| CV2001-019519 Herb v. Mailberg Missing record presumed supportive of trial court's decision |
© 2007
The Judicial Branch of Arizona, Maricopa County
Superior Court
Justice Courts
Adult Probation
Juvenile Probation
Page Last Updated 9/21/2007 12:34 AM